Anna Tatishvili vs Chin-Wei Chan Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L L L L
Form
L W L W W L W L W LH2H: Tatishvili 2 - 0 Chan
They have played 5 sets in total, with Tatishvili winning 4 and Chan winning 1. The last match between Tatishvili and Chan was at the Boston, 30-06-2008, Final, Hard with Anna Tatishvili getting the victory 2-6 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anna Tatishvili | 2 |
| Chin-Wei Chan | 0 |
| Tatishvili | Stats | Chan |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 50 | Highest Rank | 152 |
| 35 | Age | 40 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 5 |
| 55% (338-272) | Career Total W/L | 54% (302-261) |
| $573,354 | Career Prize Money | $38,501 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Tatishvili VS Chan H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-1 6-3 | |||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
Tatishvili VS Chan H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 26 | Games Won | 17 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Anna Tatishvili Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Anastasia Grymalska
Player
Anna Tatishvili
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Bacsinszky
Player
Anna Tatishvili
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Anna Tatishvili
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ulrikke Eikeri
Player
Anna Tatishvili
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
80%
(
45 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
47%
(
16 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Tatishvili
Player
Jovana Jovic
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Tatishvili
Player
Francesca Di Lorenzo
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
54 of
97)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Tatishvili
Player
Tara Moore
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
11
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
49%
(
39 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Chin-Wei Chan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Ho
Player
Chin-Wei Chan
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chin-Wei Chan
Player
Kotomi Takahata
68%
(
75 of
111)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
47 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashmitha Easwaramurthi
Player
Chin-Wei Chan
69%
(
79 of
114)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
4
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
52%
(
59 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chin-Wei Chan
Player
Misaki Matsuda
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sowjanya Bavisetti
Player
Chin-Wei Chan
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (338/272) | Win/Loss | 54% (302/261) |
| 54% (770/655) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (675/608) |
| 51% (6707/6319) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5992/5670) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 462 | Aces Total | 86 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 1471 | Total Double Faults | 193 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 576.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 591.27 |
| 66% (15708/23953) | 1st Serve % | 65% (3226/4951) |
| 59% (9232/15708) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (1830/3226) |
| 44% (3619/8245) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (744/1725) |
| 46% (1423/3116) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (263/596) |
| 46% (11037/24158) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2216/4981) |
| 55% (330/596) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (300/559) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (81/142) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (53/109) |
| 54% (112/209) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (89/160) |
| 85% (314/267) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (287/256) |
| 15% (314/47) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (287/31) |
| 24% (296/70) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (276/45) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
